I do notice the author’s, and the #CLMOOC referred to open more in terms of learning rather than software. They define it as:
The “O” for open in MOOC was essentially the only term that participant-designers held in high regard as they imagined the possibility of designing for emergence and responsiveness rather than predetermined outcomes
I don’t define open in learning that way. I have many open classes, because they are for licensure, that have fixed outcomes. To me my open classes means anyone can join my class, the materials are open for remix in the future, people can drop in and out, participants contribute from a space they own and control, yet data is made available for #openscience (with member checking before publishing identifiable data or artifacts), and yes like #clmooc participants are encouraged to learn in the open to create a reflective feedback cycle.
I don’t see this as an exploitation of labor. I do worry we aren’t diversifying open learning experiences but that takes the curation of communities and finding allies with shared princeples.
Let me know if you set this up in hypothesis. Would love to annotate it together.
Yeah, through the review process we had to truncate that section. Let me know if you want to discuss! I’m more than happy to. Thanks for the close read & I’m looking forward to the many discussions of ‘open’ to come!
That just means you get to do a methodology journal as well. So much in the “open” community can feel like:
Thanks for shining a light on what many see as utopia. (jgregorymcverry.com/3300-2/)
It’s all about learning together, so I think it makes sense,but let’s run it by the team @fieldpeaz @Seecantrill @MiaZamoraPhD. The annotations from #clmooc folks on the last one were pretty awesome & helped move my thinking forward. It’s already online,so anyone could annotate.
Same! Would love to see how others are connecting to/with our work!
Yes it is already online, and I will often annotate myself without seeking consent but given concerns @audreywatters and others have expressed about open annotations I always like to seek permission before blasting out an invitation to the world to… jgregorymcverry.com/3305-2/
#clmooc #literacies #rhizo #edtechchat #indieweb Here is the link for the Open Annotation Project of The Fallacies of Open: Participatory Design, Infrastructuring, and the Pursuit of Radical Possibility: via.hypothes.is/www.citejourna… (jgregorymcverry.com/3307-2/)
Can’t we just annotate on the page of the article?
Yes but some people may not have the @hypothesis extension installed on Chrome, or better yet they use @firefox so I use the via wrapper provided by @hypothesis when sharing so anyone can annotate. (jgregorymcverry.com/3310-2/)