Thx, and FWIW I mentioned in the -meta channel that maybe snarky article stubs for fun bot games aren’t really aligned with the principles nor the Code of Conduct (which does need explicit mentions of documentation). Finding examples where snark moves either an agenda or grows a community is impossible.
Issue is far deeper/complicated than resolving snark. Exact tone in the mf wiki. Lot of censorship/misleading/info. Take steps to improve as you say, but don’t expect much out of achieving genuine plurality. Not how IW brand materialised, maintains (I hope to be wrong about that)
I am an old model UN nerd. Plurality and good governance are rooted in good documentation. The new mf2 admins announced take community standards pretty serious. They also overlap with those frequently at IWC leadership events. Always hope for a better… jgregorymcverry.com/4759-2/