Molly Shields challenged us back. She felt our prompts suggested a separation of the text and world. So Molly threw three prompts at us:
- Shouldn’t we say, rather, that texts actually make up our world?
- In other words, how can an act of reading, writing, living not be part of the world?
- Why is there an assumption that naming is apart from the world instead of the world itself, thus separating me from it?
I decided to take up this challenge. Now I throw out this confession. I have no formal training in literary theory, semiotics, or linguistics. I have read the thinkings of a variety of perspectives including Bakhtin, Kristeva, Kress, Chomsky. I have Googled Derrida. These efforts were for enjoyment or to fill in gaps in my knowledge. So I am not as well versed as many involved in the #walkmyworld project.
In fact the genesis of my deep explorations into this field was also the genesis of #walkmyworld. It started with Kristeva and intertextuality. Then Sue Pet and I began to explore multimodal poetry through the lens of Rosenblatt’s Response Theory. We quickly found the focus on the “self” too constraining in the theoretical perspective. This drove us to Bakhtin’s notions of heteroglossia and chronotopes. Thus my reading into what I guess you call linguistic and literary philosophy began.
An interest and not a mastery. I am a mere novice, a padawan turning to Twitter and Google+ as my Master. So I wanted to try Molly’s challenge. This is the result:
I then decided to create a found poem from some of the annotations I made in the texts of literary philosophers. I went through my books both in print and pixel and pulled the quotes. I then rearranged them into a new poem. I could not think of a better way to illustrate the dialogism of online poetry:
unfixed. There is
multidimensional spaces of
within a network
unity is variable
Truth is not born but a
separation of self and world
text is a tissue
is it found?
Image credit: Connections. MT-y. https://www.deviantart.com/art/Connections-143519661