Too Many Tools
Throughout the semester I have been informally surveying my students about my instructional design decisions. The course, in its original design, used Google Sites to organize learning in modules, embedded Google Groups for discussions, blogger for reflective writing, and Google+ for sharing and discussing research.
Students often noted that too many tools were utilized. Many also adapted to the tools and created a workflow I never intended. For example I asked students to review teaching videos and post a critique to Google+. Some chose just to create a post on Google+ other wrote their critique on their blog and shared a link on Google+.
So I decided to experiment. In the last set of modules (one teacher created the other modules created by students) I tried just to use Google+. Here is my initial follow up reflections.
A comparison of the literary discussion on both Google Groups (embedded into my course website) revealed more in depth and text based discussions on Google Groups compared to Google+. The students also posted more follow up questions and larger word counts.
The quality of written response does not bother me though. This could be easily remedied. I could model more academic discourse within Google+. With time the students could engage in text based discourse on Google+. The “read more” feature though demonstrates Google+ is not meant for long form writing.
Better yet I could take an idea from my students. Some of my participants wrote an initial response on Blogger and shared a link to their blog. I could, for example, have all initial responses to reading be a blog post and all follow up discussion be comments within Google+.
This approach has a few pitfalls. Google+ enabled comments on blogger do not appear under the initial link shared by the author. Furthermore the commenter has to make sure just to share it within our community or the comment as well as the blog post go public. While I encourage students to learn in the open they have a right to privacy.
I have long feared the tyranny of the immediacy on stackable social media. I tried my best to mediate the situation by creating a category for each module and encouraging the use of hashtags. Even with these steps students struggled with navigation. Often when you click on a category Google+ may display an algorithmically determined “best” content. You can click to see the posts sequentially but not all students realized this.
The automatic hashtags, when trying to use an LMS, actually hampered navigation. I had to teac h students haow to search within Google+. I believe in the mantra whenever students must make inferences as to the location of materials you have made poor instructional design decisions.
I tried to organize their activities and encourage students to post their responses under my initial post. Yet this was not always possible. For example in one of my learning activities students had to post an original poem they created on Google Docs. You can not share links, docs, and prompts in replies to post Thus students had to create a new post, follow the correct naming protocol. As the modules were self paced and could be completed in any order this lead to a cluttered feed.
Video is such a powerful tool in online education. No not my pre-recorded lectures, but artifacts of student work. In my f2f class students had to submit written mini-lessons. I did not have enough classroom time for everyone to present their teaching live. Yet in my online class everyone had to record themselves teaching a mini-lesson.
There was a stark difference in thee quality of feedback I could offer. In almost all instances every student included modeling in their lesson plan. Yet when I watched videotaped lessons it was not always present. This provided formative data that students did not fully grasp modeling. If I just used my paper based method for grading I would have thought the opposite.
Hangouts on Air are the best pedagogical feature of Google+. Even if I drop Google+ as a learning space I would still utilize Hangouts. Hangouts on Air though again raise privacy concerns. I do let students know they can immediately go in and switch a video to private after the Hangout is completed but for a short time anyone anywhere can see what students are doing. This is a violation of basic privacy protections in higher education.
Instead of HoA I might have to do video parties instead. This would require creating circles for my entire class and then circles for each group. Students would have to record their screens while throwing video parties. I of course would like to encourage students to use HoA but if any one student wants to keep their learning private I cannot use HoA.
Even though I believe organizing my course around Google Sites over Google+ is better instructional design I am not ready to give up completely. Next semester I am teaching multiple online classes. I am debating setting one class up on Google Sites and the other class up on Google+. This would be a great self study.
Google+ is a powerful learning tool. I use it every day. I just wonder if it is better for more informal or less structured learning rather than a formally designed class. I find so much values in communities on Google+. I get just in time instruction and engage in wonderful conversations. I still want to see if I can translate this into my classrooms.